Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
PLoS One ; 15(11): e0241993, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1218366

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to systematically collate and appraise the available evidence regarding the associations between small, dense low-density lipoprotein (sdLDL) and incident coronary heart disease (CHD), focusing on cholesterol concentration (sdLDL-C) and sdLDL particle characteristics (presence, density, and size). BACKGROUND: Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the leading cause of death worldwide. Small, dense low-density lipoprotein (sdLDL) has been hypothesized to induce atherosclerosis and subsequent coronary heart disease (CHD). However, the etiological relevance of lipoprotein particle size (sdLDL) versus cholesterol content (sdLDL-C) remains unclear. METHODS: PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and EMBASE were systematically searched for studies published before February 2020. CHD associations were based on quartile comparisons in eight studies of sdLDL-C and were based on binary categorization in fourteen studies of sdLDL particle size. Reported hazards ratios (HR) and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were standardized and pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis model. RESULTS: Data were collated from 21 studies with a total of 30,628 subjects and 5,693 incident CHD events. The average age was 67 years, and 53% were men. Higher sdLDL and sdLDL-C levels were both significantly associated with higher risk of CHD. The pooled estimate for the high vs. low categorization of sdLDL was 1.36 (95% CI: 1.21, 1.52) and 1.07 (95% CI: 1.01, 1.12) for comparing the top quartiles versus the bottom of sdLDL-C. Several studies suggested a dose response relationship. CONCLUSIONS: The findings show a positive association between sdLDL or sdLDL-C levels and CHD, which is supported by an increasing body of genetic evidence in favor of its causality as an etiological risk factor. Thus, the results support sdLDL and sdLDL-C as a risk marker, but further research is required to establish sdLDL or sdLDL-C as a potential therapeutic marker for incident CHD risk reduction.


Subject(s)
Cholesterol, LDL/blood , Coronary Disease/blood , Lipoproteins/blood , Atherosclerosis/blood , Atherosclerosis/complications , Biomarkers/analysis , Biomarkers/blood , Cholesterol, LDL/analysis , Coronary Disease/etiology , Humans , Lipoproteins/analysis , Particle Size , Risk Factors
2.
Int J Lab Hematol ; 43(1): 123-130, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1066694

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Patients with COVID-19 are known to have a coagulopathy with a thrombosis risk. It is unknown whether this is due to a generalized humoral prothrombotic state or endothelial factors such as inflammation and dysfunction. The aim was to further characterize thrombin generation using a novel analyser (ST Genesia, Diagnostica Stago, Asnières, France) and a panel of haematological analytes in patients with COVID-19. METHODS: Platelet poor plasma of 34 patients with noncritical COVID-19 was compared with 75 patients with critical COVID-19 (as defined by WHO criteria) in a retrospective study by calibrated automated thrombography and ELISA. Patients were matched for baseline characteristics of age and gender. RESULTS: Critical patients had significantly increased fibrinogen, CRP, interleukin-6 and D-dimer compared to noncritical patients. Thrombin generation, in critical patients, was right shifted without significant differences in peak, velocity index or endogenous thrombin potential. Tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were significantly increased in the critical versus noncritical patients. Critically ill patients were on haemodiafiltration (31%; heparin used in the circuit) or often received escalated prophylactic low-molecular weight heparin. CONCLUSION: These results confirm increased fibrinogen and D-dimer in critical COVID-19-infected patients. Importantly, disease severity did not increase thrombin generation (including thrombin-antithrombin complexes and prothrombin fragment 1 + 2) when comparing both cohorts; counter-intuitively critical patients were hypocoaguable. tPA, TFPI and VEGF were increased in critical patients, which are hypothesized to reflect endothelial dysfunction and/or contribution of heparin (which may cause endothelial TFPI/tPA release).


Subject(s)
Blood Coagulation Tests/methods , COVID-19/blood , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Thrombin/biosynthesis , Thrombophilia/etiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Blood Coagulation Tests/instrumentation , COVID-19/complications , Critical Illness , Cross-Sectional Studies , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Female , Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products/analysis , Fibrinogen/analysis , Humans , Lipoproteins/analysis , Male , Middle Aged , Platelet Count , Retrospective Studies , Thrombophilia/blood , Thrombophilia/diagnosis , Thrombophilia/drug therapy , Tissue Plasminogen Activator/analysis , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/blood , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL